Post by account_disabled on Nov 26, 2023 4:00:50 GMT -5
the most recent video on the channel Video title links to videos that have been recently rated (in the “My Recent Ratings” section) What gives YouTube Guy? Additional Pages If you click over to one of those commenter pages like JesusBroughtMeAKitty, you’ll see the same pattern basically as the member channel page. If you head up to the main navigation and hit the “video” link in the nav you get the video browse page which appears to be passing pagerank to member channel pages and not to site channel category pages (e.g. “Comedy“) – these are blocked in YouTube’s robots.txt file. The same pattern is used on the member browse page as well. Interestingly, the “Community” page has no nofollow tags. It consists pri
marily of links to member channel pages. There are a number of o Asia Mobile Number List
ther pages on the site but this covers the big ones. So what have we learned from our long strange trip down the nofollow rabbit hole? YouTube apparently thinks it’s worth using the nofollow tag – and then some YouTube seems to think that member names are a big deal YouTube seems to think that it’s worth trying to improve pagerank for only the m
ost recent videos and recent commenters So why is that? Here’s what I think: The YouTube SEOch a 3D chessboard kind of game here that perhaps he is not on crack after all. This is starting to look more like an acid trip to me. Seems like YT is b
anking that good videos will get all of the pagerank they need from inbound links from other sites. More than almost any other site YouTube enjoys perhaps the most linkable content – Yahoo says they have 239,000,000 inbound links – so who cares about internal pagerank flow from the homepage when you’ve got a firehose coming in through the side door? The focus on the member channel pages seems like a play to become the defacto homepage for these people/brands. I guess if I am YouTube, I would rather outrank your MySpace page, your blog, your Linkedin page, etc. for searches for you. And given the insane amount of.
marily of links to member channel pages. There are a number of o Asia Mobile Number List
ther pages on the site but this covers the big ones. So what have we learned from our long strange trip down the nofollow rabbit hole? YouTube apparently thinks it’s worth using the nofollow tag – and then some YouTube seems to think that member names are a big deal YouTube seems to think that it’s worth trying to improve pagerank for only the m
ost recent videos and recent commenters So why is that? Here’s what I think: The YouTube SEOch a 3D chessboard kind of game here that perhaps he is not on crack after all. This is starting to look more like an acid trip to me. Seems like YT is b
anking that good videos will get all of the pagerank they need from inbound links from other sites. More than almost any other site YouTube enjoys perhaps the most linkable content – Yahoo says they have 239,000,000 inbound links – so who cares about internal pagerank flow from the homepage when you’ve got a firehose coming in through the side door? The focus on the member channel pages seems like a play to become the defacto homepage for these people/brands. I guess if I am YouTube, I would rather outrank your MySpace page, your blog, your Linkedin page, etc. for searches for you. And given the insane amount of.